Swiss News Hub
No Result
View All Result
  • Business
    • Business Growth & Leadership
    • Corporate Strategy
    • Entrepreneurship & Startups
    • Global Markets & Economy
    • Investment & Stocks
  • Health & Science
    • Biotechnology & Pharma
    • Digital Health & Telemedicine
    • Scientific Research & Innovation
    • Wellbeing & Lifestyle
  • Marketing
    • Advertising & Paid Media
    • Branding & Public Relations
    • SEO & Digital Marketing
    • Social Media & Content Strategy
  • Economy
    • Economic Development
    • Global Trade & Geopolitics
    • Government Regulations & Policies
  • Sustainability
    • Climate Change & Environmental Policies
    • Future of Work & Smart Cities
    • Renewable Energy & Green Tech
    • Sustainable Business Practices
  • Technology & AI
    • Artificial Intelligence & Automation
    • Big Data & Cloud Computing
    • Blockchain & Web3
    • Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
    • Software Development & Engineering
  • Business
    • Business Growth & Leadership
    • Corporate Strategy
    • Entrepreneurship & Startups
    • Global Markets & Economy
    • Investment & Stocks
  • Health & Science
    • Biotechnology & Pharma
    • Digital Health & Telemedicine
    • Scientific Research & Innovation
    • Wellbeing & Lifestyle
  • Marketing
    • Advertising & Paid Media
    • Branding & Public Relations
    • SEO & Digital Marketing
    • Social Media & Content Strategy
  • Economy
    • Economic Development
    • Global Trade & Geopolitics
    • Government Regulations & Policies
  • Sustainability
    • Climate Change & Environmental Policies
    • Future of Work & Smart Cities
    • Renewable Energy & Green Tech
    • Sustainable Business Practices
  • Technology & AI
    • Artificial Intelligence & Automation
    • Big Data & Cloud Computing
    • Blockchain & Web3
    • Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
    • Software Development & Engineering
No Result
View All Result
Swiss News Hub
No Result
View All Result
Home Business & Finance Global Markets & Economy

Samsung fights $520 million India tax demand, factors to Reliance follow

swissnewshub by swissnewshub
5 May 2025
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Samsung fights $520 million India tax demand, factors to Reliance follow


By Aditya Kalra and Arpan Chaturvedi

NEW DELHI (Reuters) -Samsung has requested an Indian tribunal to quash a $520 million tax demand for allegedly misclassifying imports of networking gear, arguing officers had been conscious of the follow as India’s Reliance imported the identical part in an analogous method for years, paperwork present.

Samsung turns into the second main international firm in latest months to problem an Indian tax demand.

Volkswagen has sued Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s authorities in courtroom for a document demand of $1.4 billion for misclassifying its part imports.

Within the Samsung case, tax authorities in January requested Samsung to pay $520 million for evading the 10-20% tariffs by misclassifying imports of a key cell tower tools, which it then bought to billionaire Mukesh Ambani’s telecom large, Reliance Jio, from 2018 to 2021.

In its 281-page problem on the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal in Mumbai, Samsung criticises Indian authorities for being “totally conscious” of the enterprise mannequin as Reliance had a “long-established follow” of importing the identical tools with none tariff funds for 3 years till 2017.

Samsung’s India unit says it found throughout an Indian tax investigation that Reliance had been warned concerning the follow approach again in 2017, however Reliance didn’t inform the South Korean firm about it and tax officers by no means questioned Samsung.

“The classification adopted by the appellant (Samsung) was identified to the authorities, nonetheless the identical was by no means questioned … Division was totally conscious,” Samsung says in its April 17 submitting, which isn’t public however was seen by Reuters.

“Reliance Jio officers didn’t inform” Samsung concerning the tax warning of 2017, it provides.

Samsung and India’s tax authority didn’t reply to Reuters queries.

Additional particulars of Reliance’s 2017 warning from tax authorities should not public and weren’t disclosed within the Samsung submitting. Reliance did not reply to Reuters queries.

Aside from $520 million demand Samsung faces, Indian authorities have additionally imposed an $81 million effective on seven of its staff, taking the whole tax demand to $601 million. It is not clear if Samsung staff are individually difficult the fines.

The tax demand represents a considerable chunk of final yr’s internet revenue of $955 million for Samsung in India, the place it is among the largest gamers within the shopper electronics and smartphones market.

In defending its tariff declarations, Samsung additionally argues in its submitting that the tax authority handed the order in January “in a rush” and it was not supplied “a good alternative” to current its case, regardless of the “big stakes” concerned.

The Samsung case issues imports of a part known as “Distant Radio Head”, a radio-frequency circuit enclosed in a small out of doors module, that tax officers say is “probably the most essential” components of 4G telecoms programs.

The case towards Samsung alleges it misclassified the part’s imports price $784 million from Korea and Vietnam between 2018 to 2021, to maximise income.

Investigators discovered that Samsung “transgressed all enterprise ethics and trade practices or requirements so as to obtain their sole motive of maximising their revenue by defrauding the federal government exchequer,” the January order acknowledged.

(Reporting by Aditya Kalra; Enhancing by Michael Perry)

Buy JNews
ADVERTISEMENT


By Aditya Kalra and Arpan Chaturvedi

NEW DELHI (Reuters) -Samsung has requested an Indian tribunal to quash a $520 million tax demand for allegedly misclassifying imports of networking gear, arguing officers had been conscious of the follow as India’s Reliance imported the identical part in an analogous method for years, paperwork present.

Samsung turns into the second main international firm in latest months to problem an Indian tax demand.

Volkswagen has sued Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s authorities in courtroom for a document demand of $1.4 billion for misclassifying its part imports.

Within the Samsung case, tax authorities in January requested Samsung to pay $520 million for evading the 10-20% tariffs by misclassifying imports of a key cell tower tools, which it then bought to billionaire Mukesh Ambani’s telecom large, Reliance Jio, from 2018 to 2021.

In its 281-page problem on the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal in Mumbai, Samsung criticises Indian authorities for being “totally conscious” of the enterprise mannequin as Reliance had a “long-established follow” of importing the identical tools with none tariff funds for 3 years till 2017.

Samsung’s India unit says it found throughout an Indian tax investigation that Reliance had been warned concerning the follow approach again in 2017, however Reliance didn’t inform the South Korean firm about it and tax officers by no means questioned Samsung.

“The classification adopted by the appellant (Samsung) was identified to the authorities, nonetheless the identical was by no means questioned … Division was totally conscious,” Samsung says in its April 17 submitting, which isn’t public however was seen by Reuters.

“Reliance Jio officers didn’t inform” Samsung concerning the tax warning of 2017, it provides.

Samsung and India’s tax authority didn’t reply to Reuters queries.

Additional particulars of Reliance’s 2017 warning from tax authorities should not public and weren’t disclosed within the Samsung submitting. Reliance did not reply to Reuters queries.

Aside from $520 million demand Samsung faces, Indian authorities have additionally imposed an $81 million effective on seven of its staff, taking the whole tax demand to $601 million. It is not clear if Samsung staff are individually difficult the fines.

The tax demand represents a considerable chunk of final yr’s internet revenue of $955 million for Samsung in India, the place it is among the largest gamers within the shopper electronics and smartphones market.

In defending its tariff declarations, Samsung additionally argues in its submitting that the tax authority handed the order in January “in a rush” and it was not supplied “a good alternative” to current its case, regardless of the “big stakes” concerned.

The Samsung case issues imports of a part known as “Distant Radio Head”, a radio-frequency circuit enclosed in a small out of doors module, that tax officers say is “probably the most essential” components of 4G telecoms programs.

The case towards Samsung alleges it misclassified the part’s imports price $784 million from Korea and Vietnam between 2018 to 2021, to maximise income.

Investigators discovered that Samsung “transgressed all enterprise ethics and trade practices or requirements so as to obtain their sole motive of maximising their revenue by defrauding the federal government exchequer,” the January order acknowledged.

(Reporting by Aditya Kalra; Enhancing by Michael Perry)

RELATED POSTS

Calculated Threat: Recession Watch Metrics

The Sunday Morning Film Presents: Shadowlands (1993) Run Time: 2H 11M

In Case You Thought Coverage Uncertainty Had Declined


By Aditya Kalra and Arpan Chaturvedi

NEW DELHI (Reuters) -Samsung has requested an Indian tribunal to quash a $520 million tax demand for allegedly misclassifying imports of networking gear, arguing officers had been conscious of the follow as India’s Reliance imported the identical part in an analogous method for years, paperwork present.

Samsung turns into the second main international firm in latest months to problem an Indian tax demand.

Volkswagen has sued Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s authorities in courtroom for a document demand of $1.4 billion for misclassifying its part imports.

Within the Samsung case, tax authorities in January requested Samsung to pay $520 million for evading the 10-20% tariffs by misclassifying imports of a key cell tower tools, which it then bought to billionaire Mukesh Ambani’s telecom large, Reliance Jio, from 2018 to 2021.

In its 281-page problem on the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal in Mumbai, Samsung criticises Indian authorities for being “totally conscious” of the enterprise mannequin as Reliance had a “long-established follow” of importing the identical tools with none tariff funds for 3 years till 2017.

Samsung’s India unit says it found throughout an Indian tax investigation that Reliance had been warned concerning the follow approach again in 2017, however Reliance didn’t inform the South Korean firm about it and tax officers by no means questioned Samsung.

“The classification adopted by the appellant (Samsung) was identified to the authorities, nonetheless the identical was by no means questioned … Division was totally conscious,” Samsung says in its April 17 submitting, which isn’t public however was seen by Reuters.

“Reliance Jio officers didn’t inform” Samsung concerning the tax warning of 2017, it provides.

Samsung and India’s tax authority didn’t reply to Reuters queries.

Additional particulars of Reliance’s 2017 warning from tax authorities should not public and weren’t disclosed within the Samsung submitting. Reliance did not reply to Reuters queries.

Aside from $520 million demand Samsung faces, Indian authorities have additionally imposed an $81 million effective on seven of its staff, taking the whole tax demand to $601 million. It is not clear if Samsung staff are individually difficult the fines.

The tax demand represents a considerable chunk of final yr’s internet revenue of $955 million for Samsung in India, the place it is among the largest gamers within the shopper electronics and smartphones market.

In defending its tariff declarations, Samsung additionally argues in its submitting that the tax authority handed the order in January “in a rush” and it was not supplied “a good alternative” to current its case, regardless of the “big stakes” concerned.

The Samsung case issues imports of a part known as “Distant Radio Head”, a radio-frequency circuit enclosed in a small out of doors module, that tax officers say is “probably the most essential” components of 4G telecoms programs.

The case towards Samsung alleges it misclassified the part’s imports price $784 million from Korea and Vietnam between 2018 to 2021, to maximise income.

Investigators discovered that Samsung “transgressed all enterprise ethics and trade practices or requirements so as to obtain their sole motive of maximising their revenue by defrauding the federal government exchequer,” the January order acknowledged.

(Reporting by Aditya Kalra; Enhancing by Michael Perry)

Buy JNews
ADVERTISEMENT


By Aditya Kalra and Arpan Chaturvedi

NEW DELHI (Reuters) -Samsung has requested an Indian tribunal to quash a $520 million tax demand for allegedly misclassifying imports of networking gear, arguing officers had been conscious of the follow as India’s Reliance imported the identical part in an analogous method for years, paperwork present.

Samsung turns into the second main international firm in latest months to problem an Indian tax demand.

Volkswagen has sued Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s authorities in courtroom for a document demand of $1.4 billion for misclassifying its part imports.

Within the Samsung case, tax authorities in January requested Samsung to pay $520 million for evading the 10-20% tariffs by misclassifying imports of a key cell tower tools, which it then bought to billionaire Mukesh Ambani’s telecom large, Reliance Jio, from 2018 to 2021.

In its 281-page problem on the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal in Mumbai, Samsung criticises Indian authorities for being “totally conscious” of the enterprise mannequin as Reliance had a “long-established follow” of importing the identical tools with none tariff funds for 3 years till 2017.

Samsung’s India unit says it found throughout an Indian tax investigation that Reliance had been warned concerning the follow approach again in 2017, however Reliance didn’t inform the South Korean firm about it and tax officers by no means questioned Samsung.

“The classification adopted by the appellant (Samsung) was identified to the authorities, nonetheless the identical was by no means questioned … Division was totally conscious,” Samsung says in its April 17 submitting, which isn’t public however was seen by Reuters.

“Reliance Jio officers didn’t inform” Samsung concerning the tax warning of 2017, it provides.

Samsung and India’s tax authority didn’t reply to Reuters queries.

Additional particulars of Reliance’s 2017 warning from tax authorities should not public and weren’t disclosed within the Samsung submitting. Reliance did not reply to Reuters queries.

Aside from $520 million demand Samsung faces, Indian authorities have additionally imposed an $81 million effective on seven of its staff, taking the whole tax demand to $601 million. It is not clear if Samsung staff are individually difficult the fines.

The tax demand represents a considerable chunk of final yr’s internet revenue of $955 million for Samsung in India, the place it is among the largest gamers within the shopper electronics and smartphones market.

In defending its tariff declarations, Samsung additionally argues in its submitting that the tax authority handed the order in January “in a rush” and it was not supplied “a good alternative” to current its case, regardless of the “big stakes” concerned.

The Samsung case issues imports of a part known as “Distant Radio Head”, a radio-frequency circuit enclosed in a small out of doors module, that tax officers say is “probably the most essential” components of 4G telecoms programs.

The case towards Samsung alleges it misclassified the part’s imports price $784 million from Korea and Vietnam between 2018 to 2021, to maximise income.

Investigators discovered that Samsung “transgressed all enterprise ethics and trade practices or requirements so as to obtain their sole motive of maximising their revenue by defrauding the federal government exchequer,” the January order acknowledged.

(Reporting by Aditya Kalra; Enhancing by Michael Perry)

Tags: demandfightsIndiamillionpointspracticeRelianceSamsungtax
ShareTweetPin
swissnewshub

swissnewshub

Related Posts

Calculated Threat: Recession Watch Metrics
Global Markets & Economy

Calculated Threat: Recession Watch Metrics

9 June 2025
Three Thoughts-Blowing Indie Movie Festivals That Present Precise Good Motion pictures
Global Markets & Economy

The Sunday Morning Film Presents: Shadowlands (1993) Run Time: 2H 11M

9 June 2025
In Case You Thought Coverage Uncertainty Had Declined
Global Markets & Economy

In Case You Thought Coverage Uncertainty Had Declined

8 June 2025
Avila, Spain
Global Markets & Economy

Avila, Spain

8 June 2025
Nigeria’s Dangote oil refinery is shopping for ever extra US crude
Global Markets & Economy

Nigeria’s Dangote oil refinery is shopping for ever extra US crude

7 June 2025
Lufthansa Group broadcasts resumption of Israel flights
Global Markets & Economy

Lufthansa Group broadcasts resumption of Israel flights

6 June 2025
Next Post
Extra options, please | Seth’s Weblog

Searching for yoyu 余裕 | Seth's Weblog

Meta and Its Many AI Plans – Stratechery by Ben Thompson

Meta and Its Many AI Plans – Stratechery by Ben Thompson

Recommended Stories

AviadoBio opens UK trial for FTD gene remedy

AviadoBio opens UK trial for FTD gene remedy

16 May 2025
What Trump Has Completed on Reproductive Well being Care In 100 Days

What Trump Has Completed on Reproductive Well being Care In 100 Days

30 April 2025
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: Colonial origins of contemporary forms? India and the professionalization of the British civil service: Agnes Cornell, Ted Svensson

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: Colonial origins of contemporary forms? India and the professionalization of the British civil service: Agnes Cornell, Ted Svensson

27 May 2025

Popular Stories

  • The politics of evidence-informed coverage: what does it imply to say that proof use is political?

    The politics of evidence-informed coverage: what does it imply to say that proof use is political?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • 5 Greatest websites to Purchase Twitter Followers (Actual & Immediate)

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

About Us

Welcome to Swiss News Hub —your trusted source for in-depth insights, expert analysis, and up-to-date coverage across a wide array of critical sectors that shape the modern world.
We are passionate about providing our readers with knowledge that empowers them to make informed decisions in the rapidly evolving landscape of business, technology, finance, and beyond. Whether you are a business leader, entrepreneur, investor, or simply someone who enjoys staying informed, Swiss News Hub is here to equip you with the tools, strategies, and trends you need to succeed.

Categories

  • Advertising & Paid Media
  • Artificial Intelligence & Automation
  • Big Data & Cloud Computing
  • Biotechnology & Pharma
  • Blockchain & Web3
  • Branding & Public Relations
  • Business & Finance
  • Business Growth & Leadership
  • Climate Change & Environmental Policies
  • Corporate Strategy
  • Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
  • Digital Health & Telemedicine
  • Economic Development
  • Entrepreneurship & Startups
  • Future of Work & Smart Cities
  • Global Markets & Economy
  • Global Trade & Geopolitics
  • Government Regulations & Policies
  • Health & Science
  • Investment & Stocks
  • Marketing & Growth
  • Public Policy & Economy
  • Renewable Energy & Green Tech
  • Scientific Research & Innovation
  • SEO & Digital Marketing
  • Social Media & Content Strategy
  • Software Development & Engineering
  • Sustainability & Future Trends
  • Sustainable Business Practices
  • Technology & AI
  • Uncategorised
  • Wellbeing & Lifestyle

Recent News

  • Clear Alerts Make It Simpler to Do the Proper Issues
  • CIO Recruitment Traits
  • Load Testing with Impulse at Airbnb | by Chenhao Yang | The Airbnb Tech Weblog | Jun, 2025
  • Scientists Urge NIH Director to Restore Analysis Grants Halted by Trump Administration
  • Cottage Cheese Breakfast Biscuits – Match Foodie Finds

© 2025 www.swissnewshub.ch - All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Business
    • Business Growth & Leadership
    • Corporate Strategy
    • Entrepreneurship & Startups
    • Global Markets & Economy
    • Investment & Stocks
  • Health & Science
    • Biotechnology & Pharma
    • Digital Health & Telemedicine
    • Scientific Research & Innovation
    • Wellbeing & Lifestyle
  • Marketing
    • Advertising & Paid Media
    • Branding & Public Relations
    • SEO & Digital Marketing
    • Social Media & Content Strategy
  • Economy
    • Economic Development
    • Global Trade & Geopolitics
    • Government Regulations & Policies
  • Sustainability
    • Climate Change & Environmental Policies
    • Future of Work & Smart Cities
    • Renewable Energy & Green Tech
    • Sustainable Business Practices
  • Technology & AI
    • Artificial Intelligence & Automation
    • Big Data & Cloud Computing
    • Blockchain & Web3
    • Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
    • Software Development & Engineering

© 2025 www.swissnewshub.ch - All Rights Reserved.

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?