Dive Temporary:
- The U.S. Senate handed three joint resolutions Might 22 nullifying California’s potential to set emissions requirements for passenger vehicles, mild obligation automobiles and vehicles which are stricter than nationwide requirements set by the U.S. Environmental Safety Company.
- Auto and petroleum trade lobbyists focused California’s Superior Clear Automotive II laws, adopted in 2022, which require all new passenger vehicles, vehicles and SUVs bought within the state to be zero-emission automobiles by the 2035 mannequin 12 months. Federal regulation set in 1990 permits 17 extra states and the District of Columbia to observe California’s laws.
- California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, introduced the state’s intention to file a lawsuit blocking the congressional resolutions, which await the signature of President Donald Trump to turn out to be regulation.
Dive Perception:
California’s potential to set its personal car emissions requirements stem from the 1967 Air High quality Act, handed at a time when smog and poor air high quality usually permeated the Los Angeles basin. Whereas air high quality in California has improved over time, specialists worry a setback from the Senate’s motion.
“Public well being might doubtlessly endure as a consequence,” mentioned Michael Kleeman, a professor on the College of California, Davis, Division of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
“That is, plain and easy, a vote in opposition to clear air to breathe,” mentioned Aaron Kressig, transportation electrification supervisor at Western Useful resource Advocates, in an emailed assertion. He warned of potential misplaced days in school or work and untimely deaths.
“Over 150 million individuals in the US are already uncovered to unhealthy ranges of air air pollution,” Steven Higashide, director of the Clear Transportation Program on the Union of Involved Scientists, mentioned in an emailed assertion. “The requirements are primarily based on one of the best accessible science, and have been finalized with intensive public enter.”
Together with public well being issues, the controversy round California’s emissions waivers embrace coverage, auto and petroleum trade resistance and debate over states’ rights.
Republicans argue that California overstepped its prerogative.
“The California waivers guidelines are an improper enlargement of a restricted Clear Air Act authority and would endanger customers, our economic system, and our nation’s power provide,” Republican Sen. John Thune of South Dakota mentioned Might 20 within the Senate chamber.
Business opponents of the emission waivers cheered the Senate’s motion. “The very fact is these EV gross sales mandates have been by no means achievable,” John Bozzella, president and CEO of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, an auto trade lobbying group, mentioned in a press release. Bozella famous the automakers key concern: “The issue actually isn’t California. It’s the 11 states that adopted California’s guidelines with out the identical stage of readiness for EV gross sales necessities of this magnitude.”
Petroleum trade leaders weighed in Might 23 with a joint assertion. “America Senate delivered a victory for American customers, producers, and U.S. power safety by voting to overturn the prior administration’s EPA rule authorizing California’s fuel automobile ban and stopping its unfold throughout our nation,” mentioned American Gasoline & Petrochemical Producers President and CEO Chet Thompson and American Petroleum Institute President and CEO Mike Sommers in a printed assertion.
California and 10 different states fashioned a coalition to foster cleaner and extra inexpensive automobiles, Newsom introduced Might 23. Led by the U.S. Local weather Alliance, a bipartisan group of 24 governors, the Inexpensive Clear Vehicles Coalition mentioned in a information launch that it could “take into account subsequent steps for our clear car packages” and work to protect the states’ authority below the Clear Air Act. Collaborating states embrace California, Colorado, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Washington.
“The very fact stays that states have the authorized proper below the Clear Air Act to guard their residents from car air pollution,” Sierra Membership Local weather Coverage Director Patrick Drupp mentioned in an emailed assertion.
Dive Temporary:
- The U.S. Senate handed three joint resolutions Might 22 nullifying California’s potential to set emissions requirements for passenger vehicles, mild obligation automobiles and vehicles which are stricter than nationwide requirements set by the U.S. Environmental Safety Company.
- Auto and petroleum trade lobbyists focused California’s Superior Clear Automotive II laws, adopted in 2022, which require all new passenger vehicles, vehicles and SUVs bought within the state to be zero-emission automobiles by the 2035 mannequin 12 months. Federal regulation set in 1990 permits 17 extra states and the District of Columbia to observe California’s laws.
- California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, introduced the state’s intention to file a lawsuit blocking the congressional resolutions, which await the signature of President Donald Trump to turn out to be regulation.
Dive Perception:
California’s potential to set its personal car emissions requirements stem from the 1967 Air High quality Act, handed at a time when smog and poor air high quality usually permeated the Los Angeles basin. Whereas air high quality in California has improved over time, specialists worry a setback from the Senate’s motion.
“Public well being might doubtlessly endure as a consequence,” mentioned Michael Kleeman, a professor on the College of California, Davis, Division of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
“That is, plain and easy, a vote in opposition to clear air to breathe,” mentioned Aaron Kressig, transportation electrification supervisor at Western Useful resource Advocates, in an emailed assertion. He warned of potential misplaced days in school or work and untimely deaths.
“Over 150 million individuals in the US are already uncovered to unhealthy ranges of air air pollution,” Steven Higashide, director of the Clear Transportation Program on the Union of Involved Scientists, mentioned in an emailed assertion. “The requirements are primarily based on one of the best accessible science, and have been finalized with intensive public enter.”
Together with public well being issues, the controversy round California’s emissions waivers embrace coverage, auto and petroleum trade resistance and debate over states’ rights.
Republicans argue that California overstepped its prerogative.
“The California waivers guidelines are an improper enlargement of a restricted Clear Air Act authority and would endanger customers, our economic system, and our nation’s power provide,” Republican Sen. John Thune of South Dakota mentioned Might 20 within the Senate chamber.
Business opponents of the emission waivers cheered the Senate’s motion. “The very fact is these EV gross sales mandates have been by no means achievable,” John Bozzella, president and CEO of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, an auto trade lobbying group, mentioned in a press release. Bozella famous the automakers key concern: “The issue actually isn’t California. It’s the 11 states that adopted California’s guidelines with out the identical stage of readiness for EV gross sales necessities of this magnitude.”
Petroleum trade leaders weighed in Might 23 with a joint assertion. “America Senate delivered a victory for American customers, producers, and U.S. power safety by voting to overturn the prior administration’s EPA rule authorizing California’s fuel automobile ban and stopping its unfold throughout our nation,” mentioned American Gasoline & Petrochemical Producers President and CEO Chet Thompson and American Petroleum Institute President and CEO Mike Sommers in a printed assertion.
California and 10 different states fashioned a coalition to foster cleaner and extra inexpensive automobiles, Newsom introduced Might 23. Led by the U.S. Local weather Alliance, a bipartisan group of 24 governors, the Inexpensive Clear Vehicles Coalition mentioned in a information launch that it could “take into account subsequent steps for our clear car packages” and work to protect the states’ authority below the Clear Air Act. Collaborating states embrace California, Colorado, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Washington.
“The very fact stays that states have the authorized proper below the Clear Air Act to guard their residents from car air pollution,” Sierra Membership Local weather Coverage Director Patrick Drupp mentioned in an emailed assertion.
Dive Temporary:
- The U.S. Senate handed three joint resolutions Might 22 nullifying California’s potential to set emissions requirements for passenger vehicles, mild obligation automobiles and vehicles which are stricter than nationwide requirements set by the U.S. Environmental Safety Company.
- Auto and petroleum trade lobbyists focused California’s Superior Clear Automotive II laws, adopted in 2022, which require all new passenger vehicles, vehicles and SUVs bought within the state to be zero-emission automobiles by the 2035 mannequin 12 months. Federal regulation set in 1990 permits 17 extra states and the District of Columbia to observe California’s laws.
- California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, introduced the state’s intention to file a lawsuit blocking the congressional resolutions, which await the signature of President Donald Trump to turn out to be regulation.
Dive Perception:
California’s potential to set its personal car emissions requirements stem from the 1967 Air High quality Act, handed at a time when smog and poor air high quality usually permeated the Los Angeles basin. Whereas air high quality in California has improved over time, specialists worry a setback from the Senate’s motion.
“Public well being might doubtlessly endure as a consequence,” mentioned Michael Kleeman, a professor on the College of California, Davis, Division of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
“That is, plain and easy, a vote in opposition to clear air to breathe,” mentioned Aaron Kressig, transportation electrification supervisor at Western Useful resource Advocates, in an emailed assertion. He warned of potential misplaced days in school or work and untimely deaths.
“Over 150 million individuals in the US are already uncovered to unhealthy ranges of air air pollution,” Steven Higashide, director of the Clear Transportation Program on the Union of Involved Scientists, mentioned in an emailed assertion. “The requirements are primarily based on one of the best accessible science, and have been finalized with intensive public enter.”
Together with public well being issues, the controversy round California’s emissions waivers embrace coverage, auto and petroleum trade resistance and debate over states’ rights.
Republicans argue that California overstepped its prerogative.
“The California waivers guidelines are an improper enlargement of a restricted Clear Air Act authority and would endanger customers, our economic system, and our nation’s power provide,” Republican Sen. John Thune of South Dakota mentioned Might 20 within the Senate chamber.
Business opponents of the emission waivers cheered the Senate’s motion. “The very fact is these EV gross sales mandates have been by no means achievable,” John Bozzella, president and CEO of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, an auto trade lobbying group, mentioned in a press release. Bozella famous the automakers key concern: “The issue actually isn’t California. It’s the 11 states that adopted California’s guidelines with out the identical stage of readiness for EV gross sales necessities of this magnitude.”
Petroleum trade leaders weighed in Might 23 with a joint assertion. “America Senate delivered a victory for American customers, producers, and U.S. power safety by voting to overturn the prior administration’s EPA rule authorizing California’s fuel automobile ban and stopping its unfold throughout our nation,” mentioned American Gasoline & Petrochemical Producers President and CEO Chet Thompson and American Petroleum Institute President and CEO Mike Sommers in a printed assertion.
California and 10 different states fashioned a coalition to foster cleaner and extra inexpensive automobiles, Newsom introduced Might 23. Led by the U.S. Local weather Alliance, a bipartisan group of 24 governors, the Inexpensive Clear Vehicles Coalition mentioned in a information launch that it could “take into account subsequent steps for our clear car packages” and work to protect the states’ authority below the Clear Air Act. Collaborating states embrace California, Colorado, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Washington.
“The very fact stays that states have the authorized proper below the Clear Air Act to guard their residents from car air pollution,” Sierra Membership Local weather Coverage Director Patrick Drupp mentioned in an emailed assertion.
Dive Temporary:
- The U.S. Senate handed three joint resolutions Might 22 nullifying California’s potential to set emissions requirements for passenger vehicles, mild obligation automobiles and vehicles which are stricter than nationwide requirements set by the U.S. Environmental Safety Company.
- Auto and petroleum trade lobbyists focused California’s Superior Clear Automotive II laws, adopted in 2022, which require all new passenger vehicles, vehicles and SUVs bought within the state to be zero-emission automobiles by the 2035 mannequin 12 months. Federal regulation set in 1990 permits 17 extra states and the District of Columbia to observe California’s laws.
- California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, introduced the state’s intention to file a lawsuit blocking the congressional resolutions, which await the signature of President Donald Trump to turn out to be regulation.
Dive Perception:
California’s potential to set its personal car emissions requirements stem from the 1967 Air High quality Act, handed at a time when smog and poor air high quality usually permeated the Los Angeles basin. Whereas air high quality in California has improved over time, specialists worry a setback from the Senate’s motion.
“Public well being might doubtlessly endure as a consequence,” mentioned Michael Kleeman, a professor on the College of California, Davis, Division of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
“That is, plain and easy, a vote in opposition to clear air to breathe,” mentioned Aaron Kressig, transportation electrification supervisor at Western Useful resource Advocates, in an emailed assertion. He warned of potential misplaced days in school or work and untimely deaths.
“Over 150 million individuals in the US are already uncovered to unhealthy ranges of air air pollution,” Steven Higashide, director of the Clear Transportation Program on the Union of Involved Scientists, mentioned in an emailed assertion. “The requirements are primarily based on one of the best accessible science, and have been finalized with intensive public enter.”
Together with public well being issues, the controversy round California’s emissions waivers embrace coverage, auto and petroleum trade resistance and debate over states’ rights.
Republicans argue that California overstepped its prerogative.
“The California waivers guidelines are an improper enlargement of a restricted Clear Air Act authority and would endanger customers, our economic system, and our nation’s power provide,” Republican Sen. John Thune of South Dakota mentioned Might 20 within the Senate chamber.
Business opponents of the emission waivers cheered the Senate’s motion. “The very fact is these EV gross sales mandates have been by no means achievable,” John Bozzella, president and CEO of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, an auto trade lobbying group, mentioned in a press release. Bozella famous the automakers key concern: “The issue actually isn’t California. It’s the 11 states that adopted California’s guidelines with out the identical stage of readiness for EV gross sales necessities of this magnitude.”
Petroleum trade leaders weighed in Might 23 with a joint assertion. “America Senate delivered a victory for American customers, producers, and U.S. power safety by voting to overturn the prior administration’s EPA rule authorizing California’s fuel automobile ban and stopping its unfold throughout our nation,” mentioned American Gasoline & Petrochemical Producers President and CEO Chet Thompson and American Petroleum Institute President and CEO Mike Sommers in a printed assertion.
California and 10 different states fashioned a coalition to foster cleaner and extra inexpensive automobiles, Newsom introduced Might 23. Led by the U.S. Local weather Alliance, a bipartisan group of 24 governors, the Inexpensive Clear Vehicles Coalition mentioned in a information launch that it could “take into account subsequent steps for our clear car packages” and work to protect the states’ authority below the Clear Air Act. Collaborating states embrace California, Colorado, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Washington.
“The very fact stays that states have the authorized proper below the Clear Air Act to guard their residents from car air pollution,” Sierra Membership Local weather Coverage Director Patrick Drupp mentioned in an emailed assertion.
